Over the past ten years, I have interviewed many people, and found that many people can't write resumes, and they will be rejected before the interview.
It is not difficult to say, there is only one key point: think that you are not waiting for the other party to judge, but use your resume to give the other party a reason to interview you.
First of all, the "personal profile" should not list a bunch of basic information such as work skills and educational experience. The opening chapter should be high-energy: why choose you and not others? You can directly write what core advantages you have compared with your peers. For example, you have written many official account articles with 100,000+ views, and you are particularly good at following hot spots; another example, your advantage is strong empathy, especially insight into the emotions of audiences, users, and Party A.
Secondly, "self-evaluation" such as "eager to learn" and "able to endure hardship" are generally classified as invalid information, which is true for anyone - there is no information increment; don't write about "brain hole" and "good at expressing" This kind of content-eight out of ten resumes will write this way. Write what the interviewer cares about, write about your match with the position and your willingness for the job. For example, the degree of matching-the main writer of the emotional public account for three years; the degree of willingness-you can read three books in order to write an article, write specifics, and write details.
Finally, "work experience" only writes "what did you do", which is a typical bronze rank, diamond rank will write "what did you do", and king rank will write "how did you do it".
Writing resumes, product packaging, and sales copywriting all have the same underlying logic: give the other party a reason to choose you over others.
.jpeg)